The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Diep v. Mac’s Convenience Stores examines whether occupiers and contractors can deduct SABS under section 267.8 of the Insurance Act and defeat OHIP’s subrogated claim.
The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Diep v. Mac’s Convenience Stores examines whether occupiers and contractors can deduct SABS under section 267.8 of the Insurance Act and defeat OHIP’s subrogated claim.
Mobility scooter or automobile? The Ontario LAT in Bartok v Intact says “automobile” under the ordinary parlance test. A critical look at the decision and its implications for accident benefits and insurance.
Two Coachman decisions appear to point in opposite directions on nexus and priority. They don’t. Wilson and Wais reveal a disciplined framework reshaping how accident benefits claims are adjudicated at the LAT.