The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Diep v. Mac’s Convenience Stores examines whether occupiers and contractors can deduct SABS under section 267.8 of the Insurance Act and defeat OHIP’s subrogated claim.
The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Diep v. Mac’s Convenience Stores examines whether occupiers and contractors can deduct SABS under section 267.8 of the Insurance Act and defeat OHIP’s subrogated claim.
Mobility scooter or automobile? The Ontario LAT in Bartok v Intact says “automobile” under the ordinary parlance test. A critical look at the decision and its implications for accident benefits and insurance.
Loss transfer disputes don’t fail because fault is complicated — they fail because it’s misunderstood. This post explains why fault matters, where it came from, and why tort findings are irrelevant.
Ontario’s new OPCF 47R endorsement fixes accident benefit priority issues and prepares insurers, agents, brokers, and policyholders for Ontario’s 2026 SABS reforms.
One cancelled road test. One medical episode while driving. The court ruling that every claims adjuster needs to see.
Is a Caterpillar 930K wheel loader an “automobile” under Ontario insurance law? This SABS accident benefits coverage ruling might have you rethinking your ordinary parlance.
Who counts as a “dependant” under Ontario’s standard auto insurance policy? The answer can determine whether someone is entitled to death benefits, optional benefits, or even which insurer pays under section 268(2) of the Insurance Act.
Must a respondent insurer in a priority dispute reimburse the applicant insurer for legal fees, adjuster’s fees, administrative costs and disbursements incurred while handling the SABS claim?
Does Ontario’s priority dispute scheme apply to an Ontario licensed insurer who issued a policy in Alberta — when their insured is involved in an accident in Ontario?
Does a marijuana cultivation exclusion in a homeowner’s policy exclude fire losses to the premises where the plants are growing?